曾建强, 华彬, 谭政林. 高煤阶煤层气储层毛管压力数学模型适应性评价[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(9): 17-20.
    引用本文: 曾建强, 华彬, 谭政林. 高煤阶煤层气储层毛管压力数学模型适应性评价[J]. 煤矿安全, 2019, 50(9): 17-20.
    ZENG Jianqiang, HUA Bin, TAN Zhenglin. Adaptability Evaluation of Mathematical Model of Capillary Pressure for High-rank Coalbed Methane[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(9): 17-20.
    Citation: ZENG Jianqiang, HUA Bin, TAN Zhenglin. Adaptability Evaluation of Mathematical Model of Capillary Pressure for High-rank Coalbed Methane[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2019, 50(9): 17-20.

    高煤阶煤层气储层毛管压力数学模型适应性评价

    Adaptability Evaluation of Mathematical Model of Capillary Pressure for High-rank Coalbed Methane

    • 摘要: 梳理出5种经典的毛管压力数学模型,并相应提出了更为简便的适用性评价方法,然后基于沁水盆地南部高煤阶煤样高压压汞实验数据,评价了5种模型对高煤阶煤岩的适用性。结果表明,高煤阶煤岩毛管压力曲线不符合Corey模型和Brooks-Corey模型;Thomeer模型只适用于孔、渗条件适中的II类储层,贺承祖模型只适用于孔渗条件较好的I类储层,而Li模型适用于全部高煤阶储层;利用式(12)和式(13)能够更加简便地得到Li模型的主要参数b和λ,且能够很好地拟合实验数据。

       

      Abstract: We pick out 5 typical mathematical models of capillary pressure and propose a more convenient method for evaluating the applicability. Then, based on the mercury intrusion experiments in which the core samples adopted are from southern Qinshui Basin, the adaptability of the 5 capillary pressure mathematical models are evaluated. The results show that the capillary pressure curves for high-rank CBM formation are not in accordance with ether Corey model or Brooks-Corey model. Thomeer model is only adapted to the II-type formation with medium permeability and porosity and HE Chengzu model is only adapted to the I-type formation with relatively high permeability and porosity. While Li model is adapted to all type of CBM formation. The key parameters of b and λ can be calculated much more easily by equations(12)and(13), and the values calculated can fit the experimental data perfectly.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回