张亚琦, 彭文庆. 非等压偏应力下多因素对煤体渗透率影响的敏感性分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(9): 16-19.
    引用本文: 张亚琦, 彭文庆. 非等压偏应力下多因素对煤体渗透率影响的敏感性分析[J]. 煤矿安全, 2020, 51(9): 16-19.
    ZHANG Yaqi, PENG Wenqing. Sensitivity Analysis of Influence of Many Factors on Coal Permeability Under Non-isostatic Deviating Stress[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(9): 16-19.
    Citation: ZHANG Yaqi, PENG Wenqing. Sensitivity Analysis of Influence of Many Factors on Coal Permeability Under Non-isostatic Deviating Stress[J]. Safety in Coal Mines, 2020, 51(9): 16-19.

    非等压偏应力下多因素对煤体渗透率影响的敏感性分析

    Sensitivity Analysis of Influence of Many Factors on Coal Permeability Under Non-isostatic Deviating Stress

    • 摘要: 为了探讨煤体在非等压偏应力状态下轴压、围压和瓦斯压力对渗透率影响程度的敏感性,利用损伤煤岩体渗流试验系统,进行了非等压偏应力下不同轴压、围压和瓦斯压力的渗流试验。试验结果表明:在非等压偏应力状态下,煤样渗透率对围压的敏感性最大,瓦斯压力次之,轴压最小;煤样轴向渗流的渗透率对围压的敏感性远大于轴压,渗透率对围压的敏感性大约是对轴压的敏感性的8.5倍,故在保护层开采实践中,通过降低被保护层垂直应力的增透措施的卸压增透效果要优于降低水平应力的卸压增透效果。

       

      Abstract: In order to explore the sensitivity of axial pressure, confining pressure and gas pressure on permeability of coal under non-isostatic deviating stress, seepage tests of different axial pressures, confining pressures and gas pressures under non-isostatic deviating stress were carried out by using the seepage test system of damaged coal-rock mass. The test results show that: the permeability of coal sample is the most sensitive to confining pressure, followed by gas pressure, then axial pressure is minimal; the permeability of coal sample is much more sensitive to confining pressure than axial pressure, the sensitivity of permeability to confining pressure is about 8.5 times that of axial pressure. Therefore, in the mining practice of the protective layer, the pressure-relief effect by reducing the vertical stress of the protected layer is better than that by reducing the horizontal stress.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回