露天煤矿智能化建设条件分类评价体系研究

    Research on classified evaluation system for conditions of intelligent construction of open-pit coal mines

    • 摘要: 露天煤矿智能化建设是推动煤炭行业高质量发展的关键路径,但在推广过程中,现有评价体系难以适应不同地质条件、开采规模和工艺特征的露天煤矿,导致标准化建设要求与差异化实施需求之间的矛盾日益突出。为此,以国家政策为导向,立足我国露天煤矿“金字塔形”产能结构分布特点,构建了涵盖基础条件、建设必要性和实施难易程度3个维度的分类评价体系,包括生产规模、单班坑下作业人员数量、采场边坡地质复杂程度、水文地质条件、剩余服务年限、开采工艺类型等19项关键指标,将露天煤矿智能化建设条件划分为Ⅰ类(高阶智能示范)、Ⅱ类(成熟技术推广)和Ⅲ类(实用型跟随)3个等级。采用层次分析法(AHP)确定指标权重,为分类评价提供量化支撑。基于评价结果,提出差异化建设策略:Ⅰ类煤矿重点开展高阶智能示范应用,Ⅱ类煤矿着力推广成熟技术并实现关键环节智能化覆盖,Ⅲ类煤矿以实用性为导向,结合自身需求逐步推进智能化建设。该体系有效解决了传统评价方法忽视规模差异、地域特征及发展阶段的问题,为政策制定者提供了“因地制宜、分类施策”的科学决策工具,推动露天煤矿智能化建设从试点示范向全面落地迈进。

       

      Abstract: The intelligent construction of open-pit coal mines is an important path to achieve high-quality development in the coal industry. However, during the promotion process, the existing evaluation methods are difficult to adapt to open-pit coal mines under various conditions, resulting in the increasingly prominent contradiction between standardized construction and differentiated implementation. Guided by national policies and combined with the “pyramid-shaped” structural characteristics of open-pit coal mines production capacity in China, a classification evaluation system covering three dimensions, basic conditions, construction necessity, and implementation difficulty, was established. This system includes 19 key indicators such as production scale, number of workers per shift in the pit, the complexity of geological conditions in mining face slope, hydrogeological conditions, remaining service life, and mining process type. The intelligent construction conditions of open-pit coal mines are classified into three levels: Class I (high-level intelligent demonstration), Class II (promoted application of mature technologies), and Class III (practical follow-up). The weights of the indicators were determined using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to provide quantitative support for the classification evaluation. Based on the evaluation results, differentiated construction strategies were proposed: Class I coal mines should focus on the demonstration application of advanced intelligent technologies; Class II coal mines should vigorously promote mature technologies and achieve intelligent coverage of key links; Class III coal mines should be oriented towards practicality and gradually promote intelligent construction in accordance with their own needs. This system effectively addresses the issues that traditional evaluation methods fail to consider, such as scale differences, regional characteristics, and development stages. It provides policy makers with a scientific decision-making tool that allows for “tailoring measures to local conditions and implementing differentiated policies”, facilitating the advancement of intelligent construction in open-pit coal mines from pilot demonstrations to full-scale implementation.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回