不同离子类型表面活性剂复配增强煤尘润湿性研究

    Study on enhancing coal dust wettability by surfactant compounding with different ion types

    • 摘要: 为了提高表面活性剂对煤尘的润湿效果,通过试验和分子动力学模拟,分析了阴离子+非离子、阴离子+阳离子和阳离子+非离子复配组合对煤尘润湿性的影响,并研究了雾滴粒径分布情况。结果表明:复配后的表面活性剂与所组合的2种单体表面活性剂相比,呈现出协同作用或拮抗作用。在协同作用分析的基础上,基于铺展功指标优选出3类复配体系,分别为阴离子+非离子型的仲烷基磺酸钠+烷基糖苷(SAS−60+APG)、阴离子+阳离子型的脂肪醇聚氧乙烯醚硫酸钠+十六烷基三甲基氯化铵(AES+CTAC)以及阳离子+非离子型的十二烷基三甲基氯化铵+烷基糖苷(DTAC+APG),并对其开展煤尘润湿效果的深入研究。AES+CTAC的表面张力和接触角最低,但煤尘沉降时间较长,对煤尘的润湿能力较差,具体原因在于:2种单体分子在溶液中分别电离出阴离子与阳离子后,其分子剩余基团会产生相互吸引作用,进而在气−液界面形成更为致密的吸附层,该吸附层可促使液体表面更易铺展,最终造成溶液表面张力与接触角的降低;SAS−60+APG的煤尘沉降时间最短,104 s即可完全沉降,煤尘润湿效果最强。雾滴粒径试验中,DTAC+APG 体系的 D50D90最小,SAS−60+APG 体系的 D90与 DTAC+APG 体系较为接近,但其 D50显著大于后者,原因在于:SAS−60 的疏水尾基碳链较长,会促使溶液中单个胶束体积增大,空间位阻效应随之增强,进而导致溶液难以被分散为小粒径雾滴;两者的粒径较水和AES+CTAC均有大幅降低,有利于与煤尘发生碰撞沉降。分子动力学(MD)模拟结果进一步表明,SAS−60+APG混合体系中,表面活性剂分子对水分子的吸引力最强,有利于水分子、表面活性剂分子、煤分子之间产生氢键和范德华力,使更多的水分子吸附在煤分子表面,增大水−煤重合面积,减弱体系中水分子的无序运动,更容易润湿煤尘。

       

      Abstract: To improve the wetting effect of surfactants on coal dust, the influences of three compound systems, namely anionic + nonionic, anionic + cationic, and cationic + nonionic surfactants, on the wettability of coal dust were investigated through experiments and molecular dynamics simulations, and the droplet size distribution was also studied. The results show that the compound surfactants exhibit either synergistic or antagonistic effects compared with the two single surfactants in the combination. Based on the analysis of synergistic effects, three types of compound systems were optimized using the spreading work index: anionic + nonionic system of sodium secondary alkyl sulfonate + alkyl polyglycoside (SAS-60+APG), anionic + cationic system of sodium alcohol ether sulfate + cetyltrimethylammonium chloride (AES+CTAC), and cationic + nonionic system of dodecyltrimethylammonium chloride + alkyl polyglycoside (DTAC+APG). In-depth research on the coal dust wetting performance of these systems was carried out. The AES+CTAC system has the lowest surface tension and contact angle, but shows a long coal dust settling time and poor wetting ability. The main reason is that after the two single molecules dissociate into anions and cations in solution respectively, the residual groups attract each other to form a denser adsorption layer at the gas-liquid interface. This adsorption layer promotes easier spreading of the liquid, resulting in lower surface tension and contact angle. The SAS-60+APG system has the shortest coal dust settling time of 104 s for complete settlement, indicating the strongest wetting effect on coal dust. In the droplet size test, the D50 and D90 of the DTAC+APG system are the smallest. The D90 of the SAS-60+APG system is close to that of DTAC+APG, but its D50 is significantly larger. This is because the long hydrophobic carbon chain of SAS-60 increases the volume of single micelles in the solution and enhances the steric hindrance effect, making it difficult for the solution to be dispersed into small droplets. The droplet sizes of both systems are much smaller than those of water and AES+CTAC, which is beneficial to collision and settlement with coal dust. Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation results further show that in the SAS-60+APG mixture, surfactant molecules exhibit the strongest attraction to water molecules, promoting the formation of hydrogen bonds and van der Waals forces among water molecules, surfactant molecules and coal molecules. This allows more water molecules to adsorb on the coal surface, increases the coal–water overlapping area, and weakens the disordered motion of water molecules, exhibiting better wettability toward coal dust.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回