气动钻进孔口密封喷雾除尘装置设计与仿真研究

    Design and simulation of pneumatic drilling orifice sealing spray dust removal device

    • 摘要: 为解决煤矿气动钻进开孔瞬间高浓度粉尘弥漫导致的健康危害、环境污染及燃爆风险,针对传统孔口密封喷雾除尘装置适配性不足、除尘范围局限等问题,研发了一种适应性强、喷雾降尘范围大的新型气动钻进孔口密封喷雾除尘装置。构建了长982 mm、宽654 mm、高1 000 mm的物理模型,采用3个等距排布的65°扇形喷嘴组成并联三段式喷雾系统,主体两斜面夹角设为60°,以优化封堵效果;建立了气流−液滴−粉尘三相流耦合计算模型,气相采用欧拉模型结合RNG(Renormalization Group,RNG)k−ε湍流模型,粉尘相基于拉格朗日多相模型结合包裹法,液滴破裂选用泰勒类比断裂(TAB)模型,以目标效率表征液滴的捕尘能力。搭建了包含孔口密封喷雾除尘装置本体、粉尘采样器、高压水泵等设备的试验系统,通过网格独立性测试确定了127万个网格满足计算精度要求,在8种喷嘴进口水压(1~8 MPa)下开展了试验验证,粉尘浓度与除尘效率的相对误差分别为6.98%~8.99%和3.75%~12.84%,证实了模型准确性。通过瞬态仿真模拟,系统地研究了粉尘迁移距离(0.1~0.6 m)、扇形喷嘴孔径(0.6~2.4 mm)、喷嘴进口水压(1~8 MPa)及环形气流流速(5~30 m/s)对不同粒径粉尘(<10 μm、10~50 μm、50<~100 μm)除尘性能的影响规律。结果表明:3个喷嘴等距排布形成了“前端惯性拦截−中端协同捕集−后端扩散黏附”的梯度除尘链,各粒径粉尘除尘效率随迁移距离的增大显著提升;2.4 mm喷嘴孔径对粒径50~100 μm的粉尘除尘效率达97.7%,1.3 mm喷嘴孔径对粒径10~50 μm粉尘最优除尘效率为93.4%,0.6~1.0 mm喷嘴孔径适合捕集粒径<10 μm的粉尘;粒径<10 μm粉尘除尘效率随喷嘴进口水压升高先增后稳,喷嘴进口水压5~8 MPa时达到稳定状态,粒径10~50 μm粉尘除尘效率在喷嘴进口水压3~4 MPa时效果最佳,粒径50~100 μm粉尘除尘效率高且稳定;环形气流流速为5~10 m/s时,粒径10~50 μm粉尘除尘效率最优,粒径<10 μm粉尘除尘效率随流速升高持续下降,粒径50~100 μm粉尘除尘效率缓慢降低。该装置通过多参数协同优化实现了不同粒径粉尘的高效捕集,为煤矿气动钻进粉尘治理提供了技术支撑。

       

      Abstract: To address the health hazards, environmental pollution and explosion risks caused by high-concentration dust diffusion during the initial hole opening of coal mine pneumatic drilling, and to solve the problems of insufficient adaptability and limited dust removal range of traditional orifice sealing spray dust removal devices, a new pneumatic orifice sealing spray dust removal device for drilling with strong adaptability and wide spray dust suppression range was developed. A physical model with a length of 982 mm, a width of 654 mm and a height of 1 000 mm was constructed. A parallel three-stage spray system composed of three equally spaced 65° fan nozzles was adopted, and the included angle between the two inclined surfaces of the main body was set to 60° to optimize the sealing effect. A gas-droplet-dust three-phase flow coupling calculation model was established: the gas phase used the Euler model combined with the Renormalization Group (RNG) k-ε turbulence model; the dust phase was based on the Lagrangian multiphase model combined with the parcel method; the Taylor Analogy Breakup (TAB) model was used for droplet breakup; and the target efficiency was used to characterize the dust capture ability of droplets. An experimental system including the orifice sealing spray dust removal device, dust sampler, high-pressure water pump and other equipment was built. A grid independence test verified that 1.27 million grids met the calculation accuracy requirements. Experimental verification was carried out under 8 different nozzle inlet water pressures (1-8 MPa). The relative errors of dust concentration and dust removal efficiency were 6.98%-8.99% and 3.75%-12.84%, respectively, confirming the accuracy of the model. Through transient simulation, the influences of dust migration distance (0.1-0.6 m), fan nozzle aperture (0.6-2.4 mm), nozzle inlet water pressure (1-8 MPa) and annular air velocity (5-30 m/s) on the dust removal performance for different particle sizes (<10 μm, 10-50 μm, 50<-100 μm) were systematically studied. The results show that the three equally spaced nozzles form a gradient dust removal chain of “front-end inertial interception, middle-end collaborative capture, and back-end diffusion adhesion”. The dust removal efficiency of each particle size increases significantly with the increase of migration distance. The dust removal efficiency of 2.4 mm nozzle aperture for 50-100 μm dust reaches 97.7%; the optimal dust removal efficiency of 1.3 mm nozzle aperture for 10-50 μm dust is 93.4%; and 0.6-1.0 mm nozzle aperture is suitable for capturing dust <10 μm. The dust removal efficiency of <10 μm dust first increases and then stabilizes with the increase of inlet water pressure, reaching a stable state at inlet water pressure of 5-8 MPa. The dust removal efficiency of 10-50 μm dust is optimal at 3-4 MPa nozzle water pressure, while that of 50-100 μm dust is high and stable. When the annular air velocity is 5-10 m/s, the dust removal efficiency of 10-50 μm dust is the best. The dust removal efficiency of <10 μm dust decreases continuously with the increase of velocity, and that of 50-100 μm dust decreases slowly. Through multi-parameter collaborative optimization, the device achieves efficient capture of dust with different particle sizes, providing technical support for dust control in coal mine pneumatic drilling.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回